Grossi’s IAEA smuggling ‘violation’ of the UN Charter, only in Korea, ‘obligation to persuade opponents’

Grossi’s IAEA smuggling ‘violation’ of the UN Charter, only in Korea, ‘obligation to persuade opponents’

​

IAEA Secretary-General Grossi said that it is the IAEA's duty to "eliminate opponents" of "violation" of the UN Charter by smuggling with the Korean media.

Secretary-General Raphael Grossi said in an exclusive interview with Yonhap News in the morning before the official schedule in Korea that he "didn't tell me that he disagreed" with the 'disagreement' that he disclosed to Reuters in Tokyo the day before. .

The Charter of the United Nations “resolves to use international institutions to promote the economic and social development of all peoples” and authorizes the United Nations to intervene in matters within the domestic jurisdiction of any State, which in Article 7 “any provision is by their nature within the domestic jurisdiction of any State.” does not, or requires Member States to submit such matters to settlement under this Charter.”

Member countries of the UN Charter include Japan, which has not announced “approval for release,” and the South Korean government announced “approval for release” on the 7th, and Secretary-General Grossi came to Korea that day and said, “I will meet the opposition party,” who opposes it.

Earlier, in an interview with Reuters, Grossy emphasized that the review report had nothing to do with the Japanese state, saying, "The Japanese government approves the discharge, and the plan of Tokyo Electric Power was reviewed."

Secretary-General Grossi told Yonhap News in particular that "we don't know when Japan wants to start discharge," but the day before, he told Reuters that "we must make a final decision on the release of water, which is scheduled to begin later this summer," and the Korean Union He deliberately made false statements in the news.

President Grossi, the head of the United Nations Organization, who was not promised prior to his visit to Korea and was banned from exclusive interviews with the media before official events, spoke about the opposition of Japanese fishermen in an exclusive interview with Yonhap News and a hotel prior to an official event in Seoul.

"That's why you meet fishermen and people who don't agree (with the report's conclusions) or who are angry. It's our social responsibility (as an international organization) to tell people that something terrible is going to happen or to go to people who are terrified and say, 'This is not like that.' " said on the 8th.

Grossi, who said that persuasion of opponents is a 'responsibility', said in an interview with Reuters the day before about the 'conflict of opinion', "There seems to be a misunderstanding. No expert (participating in the report) told me that they disagreed with the contents." I saw reports that experts had different opinions, but I have no idea what that meant. What I can say for sure is that this report was written in accordance with the rules and standards, and there was no internal disagreement." excluded.

In the exclusive interview arrangement, it adheres to the 'preliminary inquiry only answer method without additional inquiries before official events', and it seems to be 'interview trafficking' brokered by agencies to spread Grosi's unilateral explanation, and the Associated Press excludes any additional inquiries. done.

"South Korea is a democracy, and of course people can protest," Grossi told Yonhap News Agency. "I'm here to probably alleviate the concerns that many people have," he told Yonhap News Agency. "IAEA official participant in technology practice China." Regarding expert Liu Senlin telling the China Global Times on the 6th that he was "disappointed by the hasty report" and that "the experts' opinions are limited and used for reference only," Grossi said, "We do not take sides. "I'm not on the Japanese side, I'm not on the Chinese side, I'm not on the Korean side. Standards are all applied the same way," he told Reuters.

On the other hand, General Grossi told Yonhap News regarding the response to the Reuters report, "There seems to be a misunderstanding. No expert (participating in the report) told me that they disagreed with the content," and stipulated that "there is no denial of consent because they did not tell me directly." It violated the UN Charter's 'prohibition of making demands on member states'.

Grossi violated the UN's "Non-interference in the domestic jurisdiction of a member state" by presenting through the coalition the condition that Grossi's'tell me directly'.

"I saw reports that one expert had a different opinion, but I have no idea what that meant. What I can say for sure is that this report was written according to rules and standards, and there were no internal disagreements," Grossi told the coalition, Reuters He abused the trick of 'temporarily denying only Koreans' what he said.

The day before, Grossi told Reuters, "Was there a difference of opinion among experts in the report, which included participants from 11 countries, including China, who are fierce critics of Japan's plan?" What we did is scientifically impeccable," he replied, acknowledging "differences of opinion" about the report.

In the first interview after the report was released on the 4th, Grossi avoided answering the disagreement, saying, "None of the experts raised any concerns directly to me." We have to make a final decision on the water discharge, which is scheduled to begin in the second half,” he told Japanese foreign reporters, separating “restriction on Tokyo Electric Power’s report” and “approval of discharge by the Japanese government.” Exclusive interviews are dealt with by intelligence agencies or specific power agencies, and 'no further inquiries' are commonly used as a precondition.

The Charter of the United Nations promulgated by Korea in June 1991 “reaffirms the belief in the equal rights of each state, establishes conditions under which justice and respect for obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can continue to be maintained, We are determined to promote social progress and the improvement of living standards in a great deal of freedom,” he said, revealing an agreement on the official division of the territory between North and South Korea.

Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations states that “Nothing in this Charter authorizes the United Nations to interfere in matters which are by their nature within the domestic jurisdiction of any State, or to submit such matters to settlement under this Charter. As a UN-affiliated organization, Grossi announced through the Korean media that it is the UN's responsibility to 'interfere' with Japanese fishermen, who have 'domestic jurisdiction'.

In a separate interview with the Hankook Ilbo and a hotel in addition to the association, Grossi said, “I also had a meeting with the Fukushima Fisheries Association in Japan. What fishermen are concerned about is not ‘science’ but ‘reputation’,” adding, “The stigma He said, "I'm afraid I'll write it," and made accusatory remarks that he didn't tell reporters in Japan, and thereby excluded from the persuasion target.

He added: "Although very rarely, high levels of radioactivity have been detected in some species of fish that live in near waters, there will be no contamination if the water is safely treated and released." He excluded marine biology science from the review.

In an interview with the Chosun Ilbo, he responded to the question, “Is it really safe enough to drink contaminated water?” “Of course. (Pointing to the water on the table) There's tritium in there too. (Tritium contained in treated water) is below all international standards. I can drink too. You can even swim in it.”

In particular, he said, “It is not my job to turn a blind eye to the fact that (the discharge of contaminated water) is an unavoidable reality,” and said of Koreans, “We have to worry more about the North Korean nuclear issue than Fukushima.” .

Regarding the announcement on the 6th of Liu Senlin, a Chinese participating expert who disputed the report, "I was disappointed with the hasty report, and the opinions of the experts were limited and used for reference only," he said, 'No expert told me. ' he ruled out.

He said in Korea that it was his “responsibility to persuade opponents,” and then chose to go to New Zealand without visiting China, a maritime party with strong opposition.

On the 4th, when Grossi arrived in Japan, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement, “The IAEA was unable to examine the legitimacy and legality of the discharge due to limitations in its authority, and failed to accurately prove the truth and accuracy of the data related to contaminated water.”

At a press conference on the 4th, Chinese Ambassador to Japan Wu Zhanghao said, "Regardless of what the IAEA draws, Japan has already decided to discharge the contaminated water into the ocean, and we have not seen any respect for science in this process." It is not the only option, nor is it the safest or best course of action.”

The IAEA is a specialized independent agency under the UN that reports to the UN General Assembly.