Tokyo Electric Power’s ‘blind faith’ in the Korean people under the Yoon Seok-yeol government, the Japanese government is exempted

Tokyo Electric Power’s ‘blind faith’ in the Korean people under the Yoon Seok-yeol government, the Japanese government is exempted

 

The Yoon Seok-yeol government has strengthened the immunity structure for the Japanese government by changing “post-delivery” to “pre-delivery” and “discharge site” to “IAEA office” based on the standard of “trust” to Tokyo Electric Power, the leader in discharging contaminated water.
On the 22nd, Park Gu-yeon, First Deputy Minister of State, said, “The decision to start the discharge was informed in advance by the Japanese side,” and “the government determined that there were no scientific or technical problems in the plan to discharge the contaminated water.” On the 21st, the date of notification to TEPCO, it was manipulated 'in advance'.

The Japanese government decided on the discharge date (the 24th) on the 21st and notified TEPCO, and in the “post-notification” to the Korean government, it did not distinguish whether it was delivered to the Japanese government or TEPCO.
Deputy Director Park notified the public that it was a “pre-delivery,” so it seems that the Korean government excluded the Japanese government and the subject of the negotiations for discharge of contaminated water based on Tokyo Electric Power admitted to the transition.
Deputy Director Park continued, "Korean experts regularly visit the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Fukushima nuclear power plant field office", confirming the 'expert visit to the discharge site' initially announced by President Yoon at the summit as the 'IAEA office'. did.
Deputy Director Park said, “The International Atomic Energy Agency actively reflected our request and proposed the best realistic plan.” This is considered to be an expression of sexuality, and there are no plans to make it an additional issue.”
The IAEA initially stated that the report was not a release approval, but a review of the Tokyo Electric Power Plan, and that the Japanese government had decided to approve the release in August.

On the 23rd, Minister of Foreign Affairs Park Jin said, "It is a matter to discuss with the IAEA," in response to a question at the National Assembly, "Is our expert participation accepted?" It is rather a better choice" and limited to 'visiting the IAEA office'.

On the 23rd, Minister of Foreign Affairs Park Jin said, "It is a matter to discuss with the IAEA," in response to a question at the National Assembly, "Is our expert participation accepted?" It is rather a better choice" and limited to 'visiting the IAEA office'.

Regarding the discharge of contaminated water on the 23rd, Prime Minister Han Deok-soo said, "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs will always prepare to file a complaint internationally if the discharge does not meet the standards." Looking at this, there is also a logic that it is not correct for Korea to block the import of marine products from Fukushima," he said, admitting that there is no agreement between governments with the Japanese government.
Regarding Japan's stocking plan, IAEA Secretary-General Grossi said: "We do not support or recommend this plan. We say it is in line with the standards. We do not take sides. I am not on the Japanese side, nor on the Chinese side, nor on the Korean side. Standards all apply the same way,” he told Reuters July 7.
"Grossi said the IAEA's report does not constitute approval of the plan and Tokyo must make a final decision on the water release, which is scheduled to begin later this summer," said Reuters. said it was
Regarding the treatment of 'contaminated water' from TEPCO's response to the nuclear power plant accident, President Yoon accepted 'Tokyo Electric Power's exclusive plan', and at the Vilnius summit on July 12, agreed and announced 'allowing exclusive treatment even in the discharge issue' did.
At the Korea-Japan summit in Vilnius, President Yoon said to Japan, "We respect the announcement made by the IAEA, a leading UN-affiliated international organization in the field of nuclear safety," and "Please allow our experts to participate in the discharge inspection process. If a situation such as exceeding the standard occurs, please stop the release immediately and let us know about it right away.”
At a joint press conference between the heads of Korea, the US and Japan on the 18th, President Yoon was asked, "Showing an attitude of understanding the Kishida government's policy," President Yoon said, "Contaminated water treatment must be handled through a transparent process based on science, and we (Korea) We trust the results of the inspection of the internationally credible IAEA."
The Yomiuri Shimbun said, '24th is domestic and international consideration... The 24th was set as the starting date for release under the title of 'Pre-catch season data announcement and situation in Korea', saying that it was the result of considering consideration for fishermen and the situation in Korea. Based on this, it was decided that release should be waited until the Korea-US-Japan summit is over.”
The New York Times said on the 21st, “Japan’s discharge of contaminated water is complicating the friendly relationship between Korea and Japan. This could complicate the progress made in establishing the trilateral partnership that has intensified in recent months."
<Prime Minister Yoon Seok-yeol’s ‘exclusive handling of accidents in consideration of public health and safety’ maritime sovereignty ‘abandoned’, dated July 12, 2023. IAEA ‘Disagreement Disagreement No Release Approval’ Korean Government Media Manipulation of ‘Discharge Approval’, July 7th. Yoon Seok-yeol’s ‘transition to the Pacific’ mistake of allowing North Korea-Japan summit. See dated August 20>