Lee Jae-myeong, ‘National Intelligence Service media trafficking’ Watchdog journalist, American media ‘secret trafficking is a pet dog’
Lee Jae-myeong, leader of the Democratic Party, said that “secret information trading is normal” for journalists and began “making enemies” with the nature of smuggling between the National Intelligence Service and journalists, which puts them above official reporting agencies.
On the 18th, Representative Lee specified “a legal reporter who worked as a collaborator with the political prosecution office” in the “real pet dog” explanation of the “pet dog” as a relief, and compared the “watchdog reporter” who was the target of opposition praise with “a reporter who reported on the transaction of secret reports from the National Intelligence Service”. It was accurately classified as “the reporter’s pet dog who ignored the secret report of the National Intelligence Service.”
On this day, Representative Lee responded to the 'journalist prosecutor's pet dog' commentary on Facebook, saying, "They are ignoring the secret report of the National Intelligence Service, the nation's highest intelligence agency," and extreme expressions such as "the National Intelligence Service has the highest status," and "circumstances of reversing the bribed statement regarding the witness's safety." Even though a few media reported it, the majority of prosecutors' journalists turned a blind eye, and presented a clear dividing line as 'a watchdog for reporting on uncertain circumstances, and a pet dog for ignoring the circumstances.'
Unlike the official relationship between the prosecution's right to announce and the reporter's access, which is still subject to a ruling, the 'Secret Report on North Korea', which was not announced by the National Intelligence Service, is a by-product of an 'operations department' rather than an official organization, and its source and distribution have more to do with the actual reporting value than the content. Because the proportion of articles is higher, American media usually classify reports of 'secret reports from intelligence agencies' by 'anonymous sources' that omit the acquisition process as 'trafficking reporters' pets'.
In the U.S. media, prosecutors are variable depending on elections, so 'investigative information trading' is a temporary personal transaction, and the immutable structure of secret transactions between intelligence agencies and large media companies means that media manipulation is the main target of tracking, and promotion benefits are given to each other through scoops. It is treated as a regular pet dog.
During the trial, the witness's 'information' is the defense lawyer's 'publication area' and 'reporting judgment' is the media's exclusive area, and media outlets that consistently 'ignore' this without justifiable reasons are subject to 'misinformation' when a 'not guilty' verdict is found. The public's devaluation of the company can lead to boycotts and subscription refusals, and the company can be forced to pay a large amount of money through lawsuits for damages.
The official announcement of Representative Lee’s ‘pet dog’ appears to be the result of a secret transaction between the lawyer and Representative Lee in response to the fact that his lawyers provided information to reporters about the ‘circumstances of purchasing witnesses’ but no ‘information transaction’ took place.
Representative Lee expressed it as ‘purchase circumstances’, and the lawyers first followed the media manipulation reporting pattern of attempting to provide a scoop by trading information with a specific media outlet rather than announcing the related incident through an ‘official press release’.
The lawyer's trial case 'distribution of information' first created distance from the official organization and excluded 'all consistent reporting standards' from the beginning, and when they lost the case in the first trial, the lawyers presented extreme criticism to the court, and this time, Representative Lee said, ' As the prosecution's pet dog, he uses extreme language to 'crack down on close associates' and shows 'hard-line conservative political maneuvers to create enemies.'
Rep. Kim Dong-ah, a lawyer in Daejang-dong, interviewed the media about his nomination in the last general election, saying, "I was nominated in recognition of my ability," even though the case was under trial.
In the last general election, Representative Lee ran a separate team from the National Intelligence Service under Situation Chief Kim Min-seok and nominated many former members of the National Intelligence Service, The opposition was eliminated as a target of 'watermelon elimination' by the SS's 'dog daughters'.
Representative Lee operated a nomination system with an ‘upfront success fee structure’ for lawyers in trials involving him, and this media pet scandal appears to be an extension of that.
The media's pet dog is Will Lucis, who was selected as the publisher of the Washington Post. As a reporter for Britain's 'Sunday Times' in 2004, he was repeatedly promoted after reporting on the 'information smuggling' of company documents stolen by a private investigator, and as a WP executive, he was promoted. This is the case in which Editor-in-Chief Sally Buzbee, who ordered the reporting on the smuggling, was fired on the night of the 2nd, and reporter Lotart Winnett, a colleague at the time of the information smuggling, was appointed as the new editor-in-chief of the downsized WP.
The covert action of the U.S. media involves 'production of scoops', 'preemption of issues', 'policy neutralization strategy arbitrariness', and 'personnel intervention' as intelligence agencies cooperate in breaking the Fair Reporting (FAIR) rules for public transactions. Involved in media manipulation.
Representative Lee, unlike the U.S. Democratic Party's reform policy of reducing the CIA's operation budget by 20%, puts priority on prosecution reform, opposes cuts in special activity expenses, which are the prosecution's operation expenses, and cuts in the National Intelligence Service's operation budget, and attempts to engage in secret dealings between pro-prosecution defense lawyers and the prosecution by expanding investigative agencies. He came and showed frustration at this.
See <Removal of Washington Post editor-in-chief immediately after Trump’s conviction, ‘weakening reporting and destroying diversity’, June 4, 2024>
,