Lee Jae-myeong TF falsifies the ‘plan’ in the ruling by saying ‘money was paid’, Noh Jong-myeon ‘fake news’
In response to the media's criticism of the 'person-count ruling' based on Representative Lee Jae-myung's 'Pet Dog', the Democratic Party's legal team changed the phrase "we planned to pay" in the first trial verdict to "money was paid" and called it 'fake news'. attacked with
Spokesperson Noh Jong-myeon announced on the 20th that the Hankook Ilbo's labeling of 'basic facts of crime' as 'prosecution claims' was "fake news," and the Special Task Force on Political Prosecution Case Manipulation said, "Representative Lee Jae-myeong is claiming that the criminal facts are nothing more than the prosecution's claims." “The report criticizing the court for saying it as if it had acknowledged it is clearly fake news,” he announced.
In the 'Basic Facts', the Suwon District Court's Anbusu ruling stated, "The defendant (Ahn Busu) not only had the advantage of preferential participation in North Korea projects, but also his affiliated company was a theme stock and beneficiary stock related to North Korea, and Kim Seong-tae (Chairman of Ssangbangwool) was aiming to benefit from a rise in stock prices. ), together with Bang Yong-cheol (Vice Chairman of Ssangbangwool), decided to pursue business with North Korea in earnest, and (omitted) Ahn Busu, Kim Seong-tae, Bang Yong-cheol, etc. decided to pursue AB development projects from North Korea that would help boost the stock price of Ssangbangwool Group in the future. “In order to secure preferential negotiation rights for the project, we planned to pay the North Korean project lobbying fund or performance deposit to the Workers’ Party of Korea (omitted),” he said, listing ‘planning’ as a basic crime.
On the other hand, the Democratic Party's legal committee said, "Ahn Busu's first trial court ruled that '(Ahn Busu and Ssangbangul) gave money to North Korea with the benefit of preferential participation in North Korea projects and the benefit of rising stock prices as North Korea-related themed stocks and beneficiary stocks.' 'He gave money' was changed to 'basic fact' in the ruling.
Representative Lee Jae-myeong said on the 14th, "The ruling against Ahn Busu, chairman of the Asia-Pacific Peace Exchange Association, is that 'the $8 million remitted by North Korea is compensation for the North Korea business to boost the stock price of the Ssangbangwool Group's North Korea business,'" and former Gyeonggi Province Vice Governor Lee Hwa-young said, "The ruling was that it was a remittance for Lee Jae-myung and Gyeonggi Province," he said. "Even though different judges in the same court made completely different judgments on the same case, resulting in conflicting conclusions," and "rather than reporting the truth, the media acted like the prosecution's pet dog." “Aren’t they diligently distorting and manipulating the information given to them?” he said, drawing an extreme contrast between the prosecution report’s “Kim Seong-tae, a gangster” and the undisclosed “secret report from the highest intelligence agency.”
The basis for Representative Lee's 'pet dog' remark was that the 'stock price boosted the North Korea project', and the actual ruling was "a plan to pay a performance deposit for lobbying against North Korea to secure the right to negotiate", so the basic crime of the 'conspirator plan' was 'paid for'. The conclusion of the judgment was changed to a criminal act.
The official announcement of the Democratic Party's special task force said, "One media outlet said, 'Representative Lee said in the Anbusu ruling that Ssangbangwool's remittances to North Korea were compensation for boosting the stock price, but this only appears in the criminal facts that the prosecution claims.' It's as if Representative Lee “It was reported as if he had said something different from the truth,” he said. “In the ‘crime facts’ of Anbu-su’s first trial ruling, ‘(the defendant) promoted a business with North Korea with Kim Seong-tae, former chairman of Ssangbangwool Group, who was aiming to profit from rising stock prices as a North Korea-related themed stock and beneficiary stock.’ In addition, he stated, “This is not a crime claimed by the prosecution, but a crime acknowledged by the court as a result of the trial,” and altered the introductory sentence “it was planned” in the judgment to the conclusion of the judgment about “promoting projects toward North Korea.”
The special task force said on this day, "The court clearly acknowledged that 'former Chairman Kim promoted a project with North Korea aiming to profit from rising stock prices' and 'paid money to North Korea to secure preferential negotiation rights for projects to help boost stock prices.'" ” was completely deleted, and it was stated, “What CEO Lee said when he pointed this out is all correct.”
The Hankook Ilbo said, “The prosecution claimed that ‘Chairman Ahn promoted projects against North Korea with North Korea and former Chairman Kim (Kim Seong-tae), who was aiming to increase the stock price of affiliates, in addition to receiving preferential opportunities to participate in projects with North Korea.’ However, the court ruled that the motive for the crime was not clear. “The relevant ‘stock price rise’ part was not separately mentioned,” it reported on the 17th, and an editorial said, “The ‘stock price’ part of Chairman Ahn’s (Ahn Busu) ruling appears not in the court’s judgment, but in the criminal facts contained in the prosecution’s claims.” He said.
The Hankook Ilbo’s chief editorialist’s column, which the Democratic Party announced as ‘fake news’, <Is Representative Lee a ‘pet dog’?> said, “Representative Lee falsely disguised the prosecution’s disclosure of criminal facts as the court’s ruling, and further claimed that the court He stated on the 18th, “The fact was cleverly misrepresented by leaving out the part that acknowledged Gyeonggi Province’s involvement in remittances to North Korea.”
Representative Noh Jong-myeon announced in a Hankook Ilbo report on the 19th, “Even though it was clear that the crime was recognized by the court, I lied and said that it was not recognized by the court.”
The countermeasures team said of the Hankook Ilbo, “We even have suspicions that it may have intentionally made a malicious false report,” and added, “The report criticizing CEO Lee Jae-myeong for saying ‘he spoke as if the court had acknowledged the fact of a crime that was only the prosecution’s assertion’ is clearly fake news.” It was officially announced at a press conference on the 20th.
At a press conference, Rep. Kim Moon-soo (Democratic Party) responded to reporters' questions, "Aren't the expressions 'distortion and manipulation' specific expressions?' and 'Shouldn't we point out specifically how the distortion and manipulation was done?' by saying, 'Don't they do a lot of distortion and manipulation?' .
Representative Lee previously nominated a candidate for the National Assembly by paying 'success remuneration' in advance to lawyers related to him for cases in progress, and the nominees announced 'recognition of ability', showing the side effects of abusing success remuneration.
On the 18th, in response to the ‘prosecution’s pet dog’ statement, Representative Lee explicitly stated that “an actual pet dog” was a “legal reporter who worked as a political prosecutor at the entrance office” as an excuse.
Earlier on the 14th, CEO Lee said, “This is a rare case of manipulation” regarding Ssangbangwool’s remittance to North Korea. “Instead of reporting the truth, (the media) is working hard to distort and manipulate the information given to them like the prosecution’s pet dog,” calling the entire media a “pet dog.” point out as
Representative Yang Moon-seok said in response, "The expression 'the prosecution's pet dog' is an insult to pet dogs," and "It would be better to just call them trash from now on," and "Even if you honor them as pet dogs, they can't cover their urine and excrement and just cause seizures," he announced on social media.
Following the ruling on manslaughter, Kim Seong-tae was arrested in Thailand, and in addition to Lee Hwa-young's 'plan for 3 people, Kim Seong-tae and Jang Yong-cheol', in the ruling, 'stock price boost by visiting North Korea' could be added, so the concealment of the 'plan' was deliberately spread by fake news. It applies.